Sociology faculty member Christian Vaccaro presented two of his
research projects at the annual meeting of the American Sociological
Association in New York City, August 10–13, 2013.
Vaccaro also tweeted live updates on the latest sociological
research findings from the conference floor. Follow him on
twitter.com/DrCVaccaro @DrCVaccaro.
Paper: Gendered Embodiment Cycles in Mixed Martial Arts
Author: Christian Vaccaro
Abstract:
Through an analysis of mixed martial arts (MMA) gym members’
training, I examine how embodiment can be a both a cyclical process and
gendered. I forward the concept of “gendered embodiment cycles,” which are a
repeated sequence of interactions intended to shape bodies so they align with
culturally ideal gender standards and is accompanied by related subjective
experience. Specifically, I show how MMA gym members’ embodiment was an
interpersonally constructed cycle sequenced as (1) skilling, (2) aggrandizing,
(3) specializing, (4) advantaging, and (5) testing and resting; and how it was
tied to both signifying the status of manhood and the positive emotions
accompanying feeling like a “real man.” Whereas previous research on gender and
embodiment has typically conceived the process as linear, static, or
contextually achieved, I show how it can also be cyclical. I end by drawing out
implications for research on gendered socialization of bodies and gendered
identity, as well as the literature on embodiment more generally.
Paper: Identity in Action: Emails to Elected Officials Regarding the Terri
Schiavo
Authors: Deana Rohlinger, Christian Vaccaro, Miriam Sessions, Heather Mauney
Abstract:
Despite scholarly interest in identity, we know very little
about how individuals strategically deploy identity in their political action
apart from social movements or outside of the voting booth. Drawing 2,509
emails sent by individuals to Governor Jeb Bush regarding his efforts to
reinsert the hydration and nutrition tubes of Terri Schiavo, we analyze 1) how
often individuals deploy one or more identities in their efforts to encourage
and dissuade Bush’s intervention on the Schiavo case, 2) whether there are
patterns in what identities individuals deploy in their strategic efforts, and
3) how individuals use identity to bracket their support for or against
intervention. We find that individuals, indeed, invoke identity in their emails
and that some identities are more likely to be deployed alone while others are
layered in ways designed to buttress claims as to why intervention is
(in)appropriate. Additionally, we find some support for our expectations
regarding how individuals use identity to bracket their support for or against
government intervention on the Schiavo case. We conclude the paper with a
discussion of the implications of our findings for research on identity and
political processes.