Standard 1: Mission, Goals and Objectives
Chair: Michael Hood
The institution’s mission clearly defines its purpose within the context of higher education and explains whom the institution serves and what it intends to accomplish. The institution’s stated goals and objectives, consistent with the aspirations and expectations of higher education, clearly specify how the institution will fulfill its mission. The mission, goals and objectives are developed and recognized by the institution with its members and its governing body and are utilized to develop and shape its programs and practices and to evaluate its effectiveness.
Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal
Chair: Rena Fowler
An institution conducts ongoing planning and resource allocation based on its mission and utilizes the results of its assessment activities for institutional renewal. Implementation and subsequent evaluation of the success of the strategic plan and resource allocation support the development and change necessary to improve and to maintain institutional quality.
Standard 3: Institutional Resources
Chair: Barbara Moore
The human, financial, technical, physical facilities and other resources necessary to achieve an institution’s mission and goals are available and accessible. In the context of the institution’s mission, the effective and efficient uses of the institution’s resources are analyzed as part of ongoing outcomes assessment.
Standard 4: Leadership and Governance
Chair: Betsy Crane
The institution’s system of governance clearly defines the roles of institutional constituencies in policy development and decision-making. The governance structure includes an active governing body with sufficient autonomy to assure institutional integrity and to fulfill its responsibilities of policy and resource development, consistent with the mission of the institution.
Standard 5: Administration
Chair: Prashanth Nagendra Bharadwaj
The institution’s administrative structure and service facilitate learning and research/scholarship, foster the improvement of quality, and support the institution’s organization and governance.
Standard 6: Integrity
Chair: Michele Schwietz
In the conduct of its programs and activities involving the public and the constituencies it serves, the institution demonstrates adherence to ethical standards and its own stated policies, providing support to academic and intellectual freedom.
Standard 7: Institutional Assessment
Chair: Mark Piwinsky
The institution has developed and implemented an assessment plan and process that evaluates its overall effectiveness in: achieving its mission and goals; implementing planning, resource allocation, and institutional renewal process; using institutional resource effectively; providing leadership and governance; providing administrative structures and services; demonstrating institutional integrity; and assuring that institutional processes and resources support appropriate learning and other outcomes for its students and graduates.
Standard 8: Student Admissions
Chair: Dennis Giever
The institution seeks to admit students whose interests, goals and abilities are congruent with its mission.
Standard 9: Student Support Services
Chair: Rhonda Luckey
The institution provides student support service reasonably necessary to enable each student to achieve the institution’s goals for students.
Standard 10: Faculty
Chair: Diane Klein
The institution’s instructional, research and service programs are devised, developed, monitored, and supported by qualified professionals.
Standard 11: Educational Offerings
Co-Chairs: David Chambers/Gail Sechrist
The institution’s educational offerings display academic content, rigor and coherence that are appropriate to its higher education mission. The institution identifies student learning goals and objectives, including knowledge and skills, for its educational offerings.
Standard 12: General Education
Chair: Mary Sadler
The institution’s curricula are designed so that the students acquire and demonstrate college-level proficiency in general education and essential skills, including oral and written communication, scientific and quantitative reasoning, critical analysis and reasoning, technological competency, and information literacy.
Standard 13: Related Educational Activities
Chair: Patricia Scott
Institutional programs or activities that are characterized by particular content, focus, location, mode of delivery, or sponsorship meet appropriate standards.
Standard 14: Assessment of Student Learning
Co-Chairs: Nicholas Kolb/Mary Ann Rafoth
Assessment of student learning demonstrates that the institution’s students have knowledge, skills and competencies consistent with institutional goals and that students at graduation have achieved appropriate higher educational goals.